作者
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson, Judy Illes, Vivek Kapur, Moira A Keane, Barbara A Koenig, Bonnie S LeRoy, Elizabeth G McFarland, Jordan Paradise, Lisa S Parker, Sharon F Terry, Brian Van Ness, Benjamin S Wilfond
发表日期
2008
来源
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
卷号
36
期号
2
页码范围
219-248
出版商
Cambridge University Press
简介
Researchers, institutional review boards (IRBs), participants in human subjects research, and their families face an important but largely neglected problem — how should incidental findings (IFs) be managed in human subjects research. If researchers unexpectedly stumble upon information of potential health or reproductive significance, should they seek expert evaluation, contact the participant’s physician, tell the research participant, or respond with some combination? What should consent forms and the entire consent process say about how IFs will be handled in research? What should IRBs require?
引用总数
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202314243543879176896249474942482913
学术搜索中的文章
SM Wolf, FP Lawrenz, CA Nelson, JP Kahn, MK Cho… - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2008