作者
Klaas HJ Ultee, Stefan Büttner, Roy Huurman, Frederico Bastos Gonçalves, Sanne E Hoeks, Wichor M Bramer, Marc L Schermerhorn, Hence JM Verhagen
发表日期
2018/12/1
来源
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
卷号
56
期号
6
页码范围
794-807
出版商
WB Saunders
简介
Objectives
The efficacy and need for secondary interventions for type II endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) remain controversial. This systematic review aimed at investigating the clinical outcomes of different type II endoleak treatments in patients with a persistent type II endoleak after EVAR.
Data sources
Embase, Medline via Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar.
Review methods
This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. Outcomes of interest were technical and clinical success, change in sac diameter, complications, need for additional interventions, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture, and (AAA related) mortality. Meta-analyses were performed with random effects models.
Results
A total of 59 studies were included, with a cumulative cohort of 1073 patients with persistent type II …
学术搜索中的文章
KHJ Ultee, S Büttner, R Huurman, FB Gonçalves… - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular …, 2018