作者
Jeff Andrews, Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Phil Alderson, Philipp Dahm, Yngve Falck-Ytter, Mona Nasser, Joerg Meerpohl, Piet N Post, Regina Kunz, Jan Brozek, Gunn Vist, David Rind, Elie A Akl, Holger J Schünemann
发表日期
2013/7/1
期刊
Journal of clinical epidemiology
卷号
66
期号
7
页码范围
719-725
出版商
Pergamon
简介
This article describes the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to classifying the direction and strength of recommendations. The strength of a recommendation, separated into strong and weak, is defined as the extent to which one can be confident that the desirable effects of an intervention outweigh its undesirable effects. Alternative terms for a weak recommendation include conditional, discretionary, or qualified. The strength of a recommendation has specific implications for patients, the public, clinicians, and policy makers. Occasionally, guideline developers may choose to make “only-in-research” recommendations. Although panels may choose not to make recommendations, this choice leaves those looking for answers from guidelines without the guidance they are seeking. GRADE therefore encourages panels to, wherever possible, offer …
引用总数
201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024187810511114016012417515319413973
学术搜索中的文章