作者
Harvey J Keselman, Carl J Huberty, Lisa M Lix, Stephen Olejnik, Robert A Cribbie, Barbara Donahue, Rhonda K Kowalchuk, Laureen L Lowman, Martha D Petoskey, Joanne C Keselman, Joel R Levin
发表日期
1998/9
来源
Review of educational research
卷号
68
期号
3
页码范围
350-386
出版商
Sage Publications
简介
Articles published in several prominent educational journals were examined to investigate the use of data analysis tools by researchers in four research paradigms: between-subjects univariate designs, between-subjects multivariate designs, repeated measures designs, and covariance designs. In addition to examining specific details pertaining to the research design (e.g., sample size, group size equality/inequality) and methods employed for data analysis, the authors also catalogued whether (a) validity assumptions were examined, (b) effect size indices were reported, (c) sample sizes were selected on the basis of power considerations, and (d) appropriate textbooks and/or articles were cited to communicate the nature of the analyses that were performed. The present analyses imply that researchers rarely verify that validity assumptions are satisfied and that, accordingly, they typically use analyses that are …
引用总数
199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241423132830251715282929332840455733465454525150426716
学术搜索中的文章