作者
Liyong Lin, Kevin Souris, Minglei Kang, Adam Glick, Haibo Lin, Sheng Huang, Kristin Stützer, Guillaume Janssens, Edmond Sterpin, John A Lee, Timothy D Solberg, James E McDonough, Charles B Simone 2nd, Edgar Ben‐Josef
发表日期
2017/2
期刊
Medical physics
卷号
44
期号
2
页码范围
703-712
简介
Purpose
To determine whether individual liver tumor patients can be safely treated with pencil beam scanning proton therapy. This study reports a planning preparation workflow that can be used for beam angle selection and the evaluation of the efficacy of abdominal compression (AC) to mitigate motion.
Methods
Four‐dimensional computed tomography scans (4DCT) with and without AC were available from 10 liver tumor patients with fluoroscopy‐proven motion reduction by AC, previously treated using photons. For each scan, the motion amplitudes and the motion‐induced variation of water‐equivalent thickness (ΔWET) in each voxel of the target volume were evaluated during treatment plan preparation. Optimal proton beam angles were selected after volume analysis of the respective beam‐specific planning target volume (BSPTV). M⊥80 and ΔWET80 derived from the 80th percentiles of perpendicular …
引用总数
2017201820192020202120222023202469129717117