作者
Sheng Huang, Kevin Souris, Siyang Li, Minglei Kang, Ana Maria Barragan Montero, Guillaume Janssens, Alexander Lin, Elizabeth Garver, Christopher Ainsley, Paige Taylor, Ying Xiao, Liyong Lin
发表日期
2018/12
期刊
Medical physics
卷号
45
期号
12
页码范围
5631-5642
简介
Purpose
Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation is generally superior to analytical dose calculation (ADC) used in commercial TPS to model the dose distribution especially for heterogeneous sites, such as lung and head/neck patients. The purpose of this study was to provide a validated, fast, and open‐source MC code, MCsquare, to assess the impact of approximations in ADC on clinical pencil beam scanning (PBS) plans covering various sites.
Methods
First, MCsquare was validated using tissue‐mimicking IROC lung phantom measurements as well as benchmarked with the general purpose Monte Carlo TOPAS for patient dose calculation. Then a comparative analysis between MCsquare and ADC was performed for a total of 50 patients with 10 patients per site (including liver, pelvis, brain, head‐and‐neck, and lung). Differences among TOPAS, MCsquare, and ADC were evaluated using four dosimetric indices …
引用总数
2019202020212022202320244971862