作者
M.M. Lane, E. Gamage, S. Du, D.N. Ashtree, A.J. McGuinness, S. Gauci, P. Baker, M. Lawrence, C.M. Rebholz, B. Srour, M. Touvier, F.N. Jacka, A. O’Neil, T. Segasby, W Marx
发表日期
2024/2/28
期刊
BMJ
卷号
384
页码范围
e077310
出版商
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077310
简介
Objective
To evaluate the existing meta-analytic evidence of associations between exposure to ultra-processed foods, as defined by the Nova food classification system, and adverse health outcomes.
Design
Systematic umbrella review of existing meta-analyses.
Data sources
MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, as well as manual searches of reference lists from 2009 to June 2023.
Eligibility criteria for selecting studies
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort, case-control, and/or cross sectional study designs. To evaluate the credibility of evidence, pre-specified evidence classification criteria were applied, graded as convincing (“class I”), highly suggestive (“class II”), suggestive (“class III”), weak (“class IV”), or no evidence (“class V”). The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and …
学术搜索中的文章
MM Lane, E Gamage, S Du, DN Ashtree… - bmj, 2024