作者
Talía Malagón, Mélanie Drolet, Marie-Claude Boily, Eduardo L Franco, Mark Jit, Jacques Brisson, Marc Brisson
发表日期
2012/10/1
来源
The Lancet infectious diseases
卷号
12
期号
10
页码范围
781-789
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Background
The extent of cross-protection is a key element in the choice of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to use in vaccination programmes. We compared the cross-protective efficacy of the bivalent vaccine (HPV 16 and 18; Cervarix, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) and quadrivalent vaccine (HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18; Gardasil, Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) against non-vaccine type HPVs.
Methods
We searched Medline and Embase databases, conference abstracts, and manufacturers' websites for randomised clinical trials assessing the efficacy of bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines against persistent infections (lasting ≥6 months) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) associated with the non-vaccine type HPVs (types 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58). We included studies of participants who were HPV DNA negative before vaccination for all HPV types assessed. We assessed …
引用总数
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320248406967805146343842282710
学术搜索中的文章