作者
Edwina A Brown, Peter G Blake, Neil Boudville, Simon Davies, Javier de Arteaga, Jie Dong, Fred Finkelstein, Marjorie Foo, Helen Hurst, David W Johnson, Mark Johnson, Adrian Liew, Thyago Moraes, Jeff Perl, Rukshana Shroff, Isaac Teitelbaum, Angela Yee-Moon Wang, Bradley Warady
发表日期
2020/5
期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
卷号
40
期号
3
页码范围
244-253
出版商
Sage Publications
简介
Background
The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) last published guidelines on prescribing peritoneal dialysis (PD) in 2006. 1 These focused primarily on targets for small solute removal (Kt/V urea and creatinine clearance) and ultrafiltration. Even though the recommendations in that guideline started with the statement,‘Adequacy of dialysis should be interpreted clinically rather than by targeting only solute and fluid removal’, the guideline has often been interpreted as stating that there must be a minimum small solute removal target. Indeed, in some healthcare settings, delivery of PD has focused on achieving the small solute targets suggested in the 2006 guideline without taking into consideration the impact of increasing dialysis exchanges or hours on a cycling machine on a person’s quality of life.
学术搜索中的文章
EA Brown, PG Blake, N Boudville, S Davies… - Peritoneal Dialysis International, 2020