作者
Andreas Dobbelaere, Nika Schuermans, Steven Smet, Catherine Van Der Straeten, Jan Victor
发表日期
2015
期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
卷号
81
期号
3
页码范围
454-461
简介
Purpose
Postoperative wound complications, especially surgical site infections, influence the outcome after total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of our study was to compare four different wound dressings. Following research questions were asked : (1) Which dressing is associated with least wound complications ? (2) Which dressing application is the cheapest ? (3) Which dressing is most comfortable for the patient?
Methods
111 patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty were randomized in 4 groups. Each group received a different dressing with its specific wound management protocol : (1) Zetuvit (R) with Cosmopor E (R), (2) Zetuvit (R) with Opsite Post-Op Visible (R), (3) Aquacel Surgical (R) and (4) Mepilex Border (R). Followup evaluations were performed on the fifth postoperative day and included assessment of the wound, status of the wound dressing and the patient's own judgment. Cumulative costs were calculated.
Results
Clinically Mepilex Border (R) a silicone dressing, scored the best. No wound complications were seen in this group. The mean number of dressing renewals was 1.9 for the standard dressing which was significantly higher (p <.0001) compared to the other dressings. Opsite Post-op Visible (R) was the cheapest dressing. Mepilex Border (R) had the best scores for pain, freedom of movement and general comfort.
Conclusions
Mepilex Border (R) is the most skin-friendly dressing. The number of dressing renewals is a defining factor to calculate the costs. Mepilex Border (R) appeared to be the best dressing to use after a total knee arthroplasty.
引用总数
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202411612347571
学术搜索中的文章