作者
Lieselot Deleye, Dieter De Coninck, Christodoulos Christodoulou, Tom Sante, Annelies Dheedene, Björn Heindryckx, Etienne Van den Abbeel, Petra De Sutter, Björn Menten, Dieter Deforce, Filip Van Nieuwerburgh
发表日期
2015/6/30
期刊
Scientific Reports
卷号
5
期号
1
页码范围
11711
出版商
Nature Publishing Group UK
简介
Current whole genome amplification (WGA) methods lead to amplification bias resulting in over- and under-represented regions in the genome. Nevertheless, certain WGA methods, such as SurePlex and subsequent arrayCGH analysis, make it possible to detect copy number alterations (CNAs) at a 10 Mb resolution. A more uniform WGA combined with massive parallel sequencing (MPS), however, could allow detection at higher resolution and lower cost. Recently, MALBAC, a new WGA method, claims unparalleled performance. Here, we compared the well-established SurePlex and MALBAC WGA for their ability to detect CNAs in MPS generated data and, in addition, compared PCR-free MPS library preparation with the standard enrichment PCR library preparation. Results showed that SurePlex amplification led to more uniformity across the genome, allowing for a better CNA detection with less false positives …
引用总数
20152016201720182019202020212022202323121156274