作者
Paul D Stein, Pamela K Woodard, John G Weg, Thomas W Wakefield, Victor F Tapson, H Dirk Sostman, Thomas A Sos, Deborah A Quinn, Kenneth V Leeper Jr, Russell D Hull, Charles A Hales, Alexander Gottschalk, Lawrence R Goodman, Sarah E Fowler, John D Buckley
发表日期
2007/1
期刊
Radiology
卷号
242
期号
1
页码范围
15-21
出版商
Radiological Society of North America
简介
The choice of diagnostic tests de-pends on the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism, condition of the patient, availability of diagnostic tests, risks of iodinated contrast material, radiation exposure, and cost. Recommendations can now be formulated on the basis of the results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II trial (1) and other studies (2–4), albeit with continued reliance on the physician’s judgment. The following recommendations include both evidence-based recommendations and opinions based on information available at this time. Both are subject to revision as further data become available. Information related to radiation exposure (5–12), charges for tests, and positive predictive values of clinical probability assessments (2, 13–19) are shown in Tables 1–3.
引用总数
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024102935353537342417162213131291084