作者
Daniel Raemer, Mindi Anderson, Adam Cheng, Ruth Fanning, Vinay Nadkarni, Georges Savoldelli
发表日期
2011/8/1
来源
Simulation in Healthcare
卷号
6
期号
7
页码范围
S52-S57
出版商
LWW
简介
Methods:
A selective critical review of the literature on debriefing in simulation-based education was done. An iterative process of analysis, gathering input from audience participants, and consensus-based synthesis was conducted.
Results:
Research is sparse and limited in presentation for all important topic areas where debriefing is a primary variable. The importance of a format for reporting data on debriefing in a research context was realized and a “who, when, where, what, why” approach was proposed. Also, a graphical representation of the characteristics of debriefing studies was developed (Sim-PICO) to help guide simulation researchers in appropriate experimental design and reporting.
Conclusion:
A few areas of debriefing practice where obvious gaps that deserve study were identified, such as comparing debriefing techniques, comparing trained versus untrained debriefers, and comparing the effect of …
引用总数
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202421337385243393219252519269
学术搜索中的文章
D Raemer, M Anderson, A Cheng, R Fanning… - Simulation in Healthcare, 2011