作者
Elisabetta Costantini, Luigi Mearini, Massimo Lazzeri, Vittorio Bini, Elisabetta Nunzi, Manuel di Biase, Massimo Porena
发表日期
2016/7/1
期刊
The Journal of Urology
卷号
196
期号
1
页码范围
159-165
出版商
No longer published by Elsevier
简介
Purpose
Few randomized, controlled trials have compared standard abdominal sacrocolpopexy and the laparoscopic approach. We tested the hypothesis that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy could compete with abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Materials and Methods
This randomized, controlled trial was done to compare laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse repair in women referred to our tertiary Department of Urology for symptomatic stage 2 or greater pelvic organ prolapse. The primary outcome was quantitative evaluation by the POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification) system. Cure was defined as prolapse stage 1 or less, point C/D –5 or less at the apex and at least 7 cm total vaginal length. Secondary outcomes were the complication rate, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay and PGI-I (Patient Global Impression …
引用总数
2016201720182019202020212022202320243131815121711174
学术搜索中的文章
E Costantini, L Mearini, M Lazzeri, V Bini, E Nunzi… - The Journal of Urology, 2016