作者
Mark Levine, Michael Gent, Jack Hirsh, Jacques Leclerc, David Anderson, Jeffrey Weitz, Jeffrey Ginsberg, Alexander G Turpie, Christine Demers, Michael Kovacs, William Geerts, Jeanine Kassis, Louis Desjardins, Jean Cusson, Moira Cruickshank, Peter Powers, William Brien, Susan Haley, Andrew Willan
发表日期
1996/3/14
期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
卷号
334
期号
11
页码范围
677-681
出版商
Massachusetts Medical Society
简介
Background
Patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis are usually treated first in the hospital with intravenous standard (unfractionated) heparin. However, the longer plasma half-life, better bioavailability after subcutaneous administration, and more predictable anticoagulant response of low-molecular-weight heparins make them attractive for possible home use. We compared these two approaches.
Methods
Patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous standard heparin in the hospital (253 patients) or low-molecular-weight heparin (1 mg of enoxaparin per kilogram of body weight subcutaneously twice daily) administered primarily at home (247 patients). The study design allowed outpatients taking low-molecular-weight heparin to go home immediately and hospitalized patients taking low-molecular-weight heparin to be discharged early. All the …
引用总数
19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024229711911112310292116102937166565843353035271926351818261710124