作者
Vincenzo Ficarra, Giacomo Novara, Raymond C Rosen, Walter Artibani, Peter R Carroll, Anthony Costello, Mani Menon, Francesco Montorsi, Vipul R Patel, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg, Henk Van der Poel, Timothy G Wilson, Filiberto Zattoni, Alexandre Mottrie
发表日期
2012/9/1
来源
European urology
卷号
62
期号
3
页码范围
405-417
出版商
Elsevier
简介
CONTEXT
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was proposed to improve functional outcomes in comparison with retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). In the initial RARP series, 12-mo urinary continence recovery rates ranged from 84% to 97%. However, the few available studies comparing RARP with RRP or LRP published before 2008 did not permit any definitive conclusions about the superiority of any one of these techniques in terms of urinary continence recovery.
OBJECTIVE
The aims of this systematic review were (1) to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for urinary incontinence after RARP, (2) to identify surgical techniques able to improve urinary continence recovery after RARP, and (3) to perform a cumulative analysis of all available studies comparing RARP versus RRP or LRP in terms of the urinary continence recovery rate.
EVIDENCE …
引用总数
学术搜索中的文章
V Ficarra, G Novara, RC Rosen, W Artibani, PR Carroll… - European urology, 2012