作者
Santiago Garcia, Yader Sandoval, Henri Roukoz, Selcuk Adabag, Mariana Canoniero, Demetris Yannopoulos, Emmanouil S Brilakis
发表日期
2013/10/15
期刊
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
卷号
62
期号
16
页码范围
1421-1431
出版商
American College of Cardiology Foundation
简介
Objectives
This study sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing complete revascularization (CR) versus incomplete revascularization (IR) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Background
There are conflicting data regarding the benefits of CR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Methods
We identified observational studies and subgroup analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) published in PubMed from 1970 through September 2012 using the following keywords: “percutaneous coronary intervention” (PCI); “coronary artery bypass graft” (CABG); “complete revascularization”; and “incomplete revascularization.” Main outcome measures were total mortality, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization procedures.
Results
We identified 35 studies including 89,883 patients, of whom 45,417 (50.5%) received CR and 44,466 (49.5%) received IR …
学术搜索中的文章
S Garcia, Y Sandoval, H Roukoz, S Adabag… - Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013