作者
Ilann Bourgeois, Jeff Peischl, J Andrew Neuman, Steven S Brown, Hannah M Allen, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Matthew M Coggon, Joshua P DiGangi, Glenn S Diskin, Jessica B Gilman, Georgios I Gkatzelis, Hongyu Guo, Hannah Halliday, Thomas F Hanisco, Christopher D Holmes, L Gregory Huey, Jose L Jimenez, Aaron D Lamplugh, Young Ro Lee, Jakob Lindaas, Richard H Moore, John B Nowak, Demetrios Pagonis, Pamela S Rickly, Michael A Robinson, Andrew W Rollins, Vanessa Selimovic, Jason M St. Clair, David Tanner, Krystal T Vasquez, Patrick R Veres, Carsten Warneke, Paul O Wennberg, Rebecca A Washenfelder, Elizabeth B Wiggins, Caroline C Womack, Lu Xu, Kyle J Zarzana, Thomas B Ryerson
发表日期
2022/1/3
期刊
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions
卷号
2022
页码范围
1-47
简介
We present a comparison of fast-response instruments installed onboard the NASA DC-8 aircraft that measured nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2), nitrous acid (HONO), total reactive odd nitrogen (measured both as the total (NOy) and from the sum of individually measured species (SNOy)) and carbon monoxide (CO) in the troposphere during the 2019 Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX-AQ) campaign. By targeting smoke from summertime wildfires, prescribed fires and agricultural burns across the continental United States, FIREX-AQ provided a unique opportunity to investigate measurement accuracy in concentrated plumes where hundreds of species coexist. Here, we compare NO measurements by chemiluminescence (CL) and laser induced fluorescence (LIF); NO2 measurements by CL, LIF and cavity enhanced spectroscopy (CES); HONO measurements by CES and iodide-adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS); and CO measurements by tunable diode laser absorption spectrometry (TDLAS) and integrated cavity output spectroscopy (ICOS). Additionally, total NOy measurements using the CL instrument were compared with SNOy (= NO + NO2 + HONO + nitric acid (HNO3) + acyl peroxy nitrates (APNs) + submicron particulate nitrate (pNO3)). The aircraft instrument intercomparisons demonstrate the following: 1) NO measurements by CL and LIF agreed well within instrument uncertainties, but with potentially reduced time response for the CL instrument; 2) NO2 measurements by LIF and CES agreed well within instrument uncertainties, but CL NO2 was on average 10 % higher; 3) CES …
引用总数
学术搜索中的文章
I Bourgeois, J Peischl, JA Neuman, SS Brown… - Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, 2022