作者
Xavier Calvet, Mercedes Vergara, Enric Brullet, Javier P Gisbert, Rafel Campo
发表日期
2004/2/1
来源
Gastroenterology
卷号
126
期号
2
页码范围
441-450
出版商
WB Saunders
简介
Background & Aims
Endoscopic therapy reduces the rebleeding rate, the need for surgery, and the mortality in patients with peptic ulcer and active bleeding or visible vessel. Injection of epinephrine is the most popular therapeutic method. Guidelines disagree on the need for a second hemostatic procedure immediately after epinephrine; although it seems to reduce further bleeding, its effects on morbidity, surgery rates, and mortality remain unclear. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether the addition of a second procedure improves hemostatic efficacy and/or patient outcomes after epinephrine injection.
Methods
An extensive search for randomized trials comparing epinephrine alone vs. epinephrine plus a second method was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE and in the abstracts of the AGA Congresses between 1990 and 2002. Selected articles were …
引用总数
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241131621282823362217323026241591098941