作者
Emma E Thomas, Monica L Taylor, Annie Banbury, Centaine L Snoswell, Helen M Haydon, Victor M Gallegos Rejas, Anthony C Smith, Liam J Caffery
发表日期
2021/8/1
来源
BMJ open
卷号
11
期号
8
页码范围
e051844
出版商
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
简介
Objectives
Our recent systematic review determined that remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions can reduce acute care use. However, effectiveness varied within and between populations. Clinicians, researchers, and policymakers require more than evidence of effect; they need guidance on how best to design and implement RPM interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to explore these results further to (1) identify factors of RPM interventions that relate to increased and decreased acute care use and (2) develop recommendations for future RPM interventions.
Design
Realist review—a qualitative systematic review method which aims to identify and explain why intervention results vary in different situations. We analysed secondarily 91 studies included in our previous systematic review that reported on RPM interventions and the impact on acute care use. Online databases PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL …
学术搜索中的文章
EE Thomas, ML Taylor, A Banbury, CL Snoswell… - BMJ open, 2021