作者
Grace En Hui Lim, Ansel Tang, Yip Han Chin, Jie Ning Yong, Darren Tan, Phoebe Tay, Yu Yi Chan, Denzel Ming Wei Lim, Jun Wei Yeo, Kai En Chan, Kamala Devi, Colin Eng Choon Ong, Roger SY Foo, Huay-Cheem Tan, Mark Y Chan, Roger Ho, Poay Huan Loh, Nicholas WS Chew
发表日期
2022/11/30
期刊
Plos one
卷号
17
期号
11
页码范围
e0278326
出版商
Public Library of Science
简介
Background
Post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) depression is a common but not well understood complication experienced by ACS patients. Research on the effectiveness of various therapies remains limited. Hence, we sought to conduct a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of different interventions for post-ACS depression in improving patient outcomes.
Methods and findings
Three electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials describing different depression treatment modalities in post-ACS patients. Each article was screened based on inclusion criteria and relevant data were extracted. A bivariate analysis and a network meta-analysis was performed using risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively.
A total of 30 articles were included in our analysis. Compared to standard care, psychosocial therapy was associated with the greatest reduction in depression scores (SMD:-1.21, 95% CI: -1.81 to -0.61, p<0.001), followed by cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) (SMD: -0.75, 95% CI: -0.99 to -0.52, p<0.001), antidepressants (SMD: -0.73, 95% CI: -1.14 to -0.31, p<0.001), and lastly, combination therapy (SMD: -0.15, 95% CI: -0.28 to -0.03, p = 0.016). No treatment modalities was found to be more effective in reducing depression scores when compared to one another. Additional analysis showed that these treatment modalities did not have significant impact on the overall mortality, cardiac mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction.
Conclusion
This network meta-analysis found that the treatment effect of the various psychological modalities on …
引用总数