作者
Deepali Prakash, Leonie Heskin, Sally Doherty, Rose Galvin
发表日期
2017/2/1
来源
The Surgeon
卷号
15
期号
1
页码范围
47-57
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Background
Inguinal hernias are a significant cause of morbidity. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the totality of evidence regarding the effectiveness of local anaesthesia when compared to spinal anaesthesia in individuals undergoing open inguinal hernia repair.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing spinal and local anaesthesia on clinical and self-reported outcomes, in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repairs. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The mode of analysis used was the difference in outcomes between the groups post-surgery and at follow-up time points. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.
Results
Ten original RCTs were included, with a total of 1379 patients. There was no significant difference in …
引用总数
20162017201820192020202120222023202415512461282