作者
Angela Fagerlin, Michael Pignone, Purva Abhyankar, Nananda Col, Deb Feldman-Stewart, Teresa Gavaruzzi, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Carrie A Levin, Arwen H Pieterse, Valerie Reyna, Anne Stiggelbout, Laura D Scherer, Celia Wills, Holly O Witteman
发表日期
2013/11
来源
BMC medical informatics and decision making
卷号
13
页码范围
1-7
出版商
BioMed Central
简介
Background
Consensus guidelines have recommended that decision aids include a process for helping patients clarify their values. We sought to examine the theoretical and empirical evidence related to the use of values clarification methods in patient decision aids.
Methods
Building on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration’s 2005 review of values clarification methods in decision aids, we convened a multi-disciplinary expert group to examine key definitions, decision-making process theories, and empirical evidence about the effects of values clarification methods in decision aids. To summarize the current state of theory and evidence about the role of values clarification methods in decision aids, we undertook a process of evidence review and summary.
Results
Values clarification …
学术搜索中的文章
A Fagerlin, M Pignone, P Abhyankar, N Col… - BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2013