作者
Charles G Fisher, Christian P DiPaola, Timothy C Ryken, Mark H Bilsky, Christopher I Shaffrey, Sigurd H Berven, James S Harrop, Michael G Fehlings, Stefano Boriani, Dean Chou, Meic H Schmidt, David W Polly, Roberto Biagini, Shane Burch, Mark B Dekutoski, Aruna Ganju, Peter C Gerszten, Ziya L Gokaslan, Michael W Groff, Norbert J Liebsch, Ehud Mendel, Scott H Okuno, Shreyaskumar Patel, Laurence D Rhines, Peter S Rose, Daniel M Sciubba, Narayan Sundaresan, Katsuro Tomita, Peter P Varga, Luiz R Vialle, Frank D Vrionis, Yoshiya Yamada, Daryl R Fourney
发表日期
2010/10/15
来源
Spine
卷号
35
期号
22
页码范围
E1221-E1229
出版商
LWW
简介
Study Design.
Systematic review and modified Delphi technique.
Objective.
To use an evidence-based medicine process using the best available literature and expert opinion consensus to develop a comprehensive classification system to diagnose neoplastic spinal instability.
Summary of Background Data.
Spinal instability is poorly defined in the literature and presently there is a lack of guidelines available to aid in defining the degree of spinal instability in the setting of neoplastic spinal disease. The concept of spinal instability remains important in the clinical decision-making process for patients with spine tumors.
Methods.
We have integrated the evidence provided by systematic reviews through a modified Delphi technique to generate a consensus of best evidence and expert opinion to develop a classification system to define neoplastic spinal instability.
Results.
A comprehensive classification system based on …
引用总数
学术搜索中的文章
CG Fisher, CP DiPaola, TC Ryken, MH Bilsky… - Spine, 2010