作者
Steven P Segal, Lachlan Rimes, Leena Badran
发表日期
2023/1/1
期刊
Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
卷号
4
期号
1
页码范围
sgac071
出版商
Oxford University Press
简介
Background
Provision of involuntary care is an abridgment of civil rights and a source of controversy. Its circumstances require continued monitoring. This study asks 4 questions: Whether, in an era, focused on allowing patients with capacity to refuse community-treatment-order (CTO)-assignments, CTO use decreased. And whether CTOs fulfilled 3 statute mandates: Were CTO-assigned patients in greater need of treatment than other psychiatric inpatients? Was CTO assignment a less-restrictive alternative to psychiatric hospitalization? and Did CTO assignment provide needed treatment at internationally recommended levels with consequences for patient outcomes?
Method
All 214 388 Victoria, Australia mental health admissions between 2000– 2017 were reviewed. Two cohort samples were drawn and followed through 2019—ie, all 7826 hospitalized patients who were first …
引用总数