作者
Miguel O'Ryan, Ananda S Bandyopadhyay, Rodolfo Villena, Mónica Espinoza, José Novoa, William C Weldon, M Steven Oberste, Steve Self, Bhavesh R Borate, Edwin J Asturias, Ralf Clemens, Walter Orenstein, José Jimeno, Ricardo Rüttimann, Sue Ann Costa Clemens
发表日期
2015/11/1
期刊
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
卷号
15
期号
11
页码范围
1273-1282
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Background
Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV; types 1 and 3) is expected to replace trivalent OPV (tOPV) globally by April, 2016, preceded by the introduction of at least one dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in routine immunisation programmes to eliminate vaccine-associated or vaccine-derived poliomyelitis from serotype 2 poliovirus. Because data are needed on sequential IPV–bOPV schedules, we assessed the immunogenicity of two different IPV–bOPV schedules compared with an all-IPV schedule in infants.
Methods
We did a randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial with healthy, full-term (>2·5 kg birthweight) infants aged 8 weeks (± 7 days) at six well-child clinics in Santiago, Chile. We used supplied lists to randomly assign infants (1:1:1) to receive three polio vaccinations (IPV by injection or bOPV as oral drops) at age 8, 16, and 24 weeks in one of three sequential schedules: IPV …
引用总数
201520162017201820192020202120222023202411517181049944