作者
Clément Palpacuer, Karima Hammas, Renan Duprez, Bruno Laviolle, John PA Ioannidis, Florian Naudet
发表日期
2019/12
期刊
BMC medicine
卷号
17
页码范围
1-13
出版商
BioMed Central
简介
Background
Different methodological choices such as inclusion/exclusion criteria and analytical models can yield different results and inferences when meta-analyses are performed. We explored the range of such differences, using several methodological choices for indirect comparison meta-analyses to compare nalmefene and naltrexone in the reduction of alcohol consumption as a case study.
Methods
All double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nalmefene to naltrexone or one of these compounds to a placebo in the treatment of alcohol dependence or alcohol use disorders were considered. Two reviewers searched for published and unpublished studies in MEDLINE (August 2017), the Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov and contacted pharmaceutical companies, the European Medicines Agency, and the Food …
引用总数
201920202021202220232024191291511