作者
Nikhil R Thiruvengadam, Monica Saumoy, Yecheskel Schneider, Sara Attala, Joseph Triggs, Peter Lee, Michael L Kochman
发表日期
2022/1/1
期刊
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
卷号
20
期号
1
页码范围
216-226. e42
出版商
WB Saunders
简介
Background & Aims Post–endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common adverse event after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and is responsible for substantial morbidity and health care expenditures of at least $200 million. Therapies for PEP prevention include pancreatic stent placement (PSP), rectal indomethacin, sublingual nitrates, and aggressive lactated Ringer’s hydration. Our objective was to determine which PEP prophylactic strategies are cost effective. Methods We developed 2 separate decision trees to evaluate PEP prophylactic strategies. The first, in high-risk patients, compared rectal indomethacin, PSP, PSP with indomethacin, sublingual nitrates, aggressive hydration with lactated Ringer’s, and no prophylaxis. The second, in average-risk patients, compared rectal indomethacin, sublingual nitrates, aggressive hydration, and no …
引用总数
学术搜索中的文章