作者
Samuel Han, Furqan Bhullar, Omar Alaber, Ayesha Kamal, Puanani Hopson, Kavin Kanthasamy, Sarah Coughlin, Livia Archibugi, Nikhil Thiruvengadam, Christopher Moreau, David Jin, Pedram Paragomi, Francisco Valverde-López, Sajan Nagpal, Cemal Yazici, Georgios Papachristou, Peter J Lee, Venkata Akshintala
发表日期
2021/6
期刊
Endoscopy international open
卷号
9
期号
06
页码范围
E853-E862
出版商
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
简介
Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue sampling is the standard of care for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. While many two-way comparisons between needle types have been made in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is unclear which size and type of needle offers the best probability of diagnosis. We therefore performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different sized and shaped needles to rank the diagnostic performance of each needle.
Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases through August, 2020 for RCTs that compared the diagnostic accuracy of EUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and biopsy (FNB) needles in solid pancreatic masses. Using a random-effects NMA under the frequentist framework, RCTs were analyzed to identify the best needle type and sampling technique. Performance scores (P-scores) were …
引用总数
学术搜索中的文章