作者
Gurkaran S Sarohia, Keean Nanji, Mohammad Khan, Muhammad F Khalid, Daniel Rosenberg, Deven M Deonarain, Mark R Phillips, Lehana Thabane, Peter K Kaiser, Sunir J Garg, Sobha Sivaprasad, Charles C Wykoff, Varun Chaudhary
发表日期
2022/9/1
来源
Survey of Ophthalmology
卷号
67
期号
5
页码范围
1346-1363
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) agents are the standard of care for diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) with vision loss. They are commonly administered using several treatment protocols, including fixed, pro re nata (PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens. Because of the lack of evidence defining an ideal treatment paradigm, we systematically compared T&E with fixed or PRN regimens. Visual acuity improvement was similar when comparing T&E to fixed or PRN dosing at 12 and 24 months. Regarding anatomic outcomes, no significant difference was found between T&E and fixed regimens for central retinal thickness or central subfoveal thickness at 12 and 24 months. Similarly, no significant difference was found for central retinal thickness at 12 months for T&E versus PRN regimen. Regarding total number of injections, no significant difference existed between T&E versus fixed regimens at …
引用总数