作者
Samuel G Armato III, Rachael Y Roberts, Masha Kocherginsky, Denise R Aberle, Ella A Kazerooni, Heber MacMahon, Edwin JR van Beek, David Yankelevitz, Geoffrey McLennan, Michael F McNitt-Gray, Charles R Meyer, Anthony P Reeves, Philip Caligiuri, Leslie E Quint, Baskaran Sundaram, Barbara Y Croft, Laurence P Clarke
发表日期
2009/1/1
期刊
Academic radiology
卷号
16
期号
1
页码范围
28-38
出版商
Elsevier
简介
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES
Studies that evaluate the lung nodule–detection performance of radiologists or computerized methods depend on an initial inventory of the nodules within the thoracic images (the “truth”). The purpose of this study was to analyze (1) variability in the “truth” defined by different combinations of experienced thoracic radiologists and (2) variability in the performance of other experienced thoracic radiologists based on these definitions of “truth” in the context of lung nodule detection on computed tomographic (CT) scans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty-five thoracic CT scans were reviewed by four thoracic radiologists, who independently marked lesions they considered to be nodules ≥3 mm in maximum diameter. Panel “truth” sets of nodules were then derived from the nodules marked by different combinations of two and three of these four radiologists. The nodule detection …
引用总数
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024111267738457752691