作者
Abdelrahman Elshafay, Esraa Salah Omran, Mariam Abdelkhalek, Mohamed Omar El-Badry, Heba Gamal Eisa, Salma Y Fala, Thao Dang, Mohammad AT Ghanem, Maha Elbadawy, Mohamed Tamer Elhady, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Kenji Hirayama, Nguyen Tien Huy
发表日期
2019/5/28
来源
Current Medical Research and Opinion
出版商
Taylor & Francis
简介
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyses of in vitro research have an important role in establishing the foundation for clinical studies. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the reporting quality of SRs of in vitro studies using the PRISMA checklist.
Method: Four databases were searched including PubMed, Virtual Health Library (VHL), Web of Science (ISI) and Scopus. The search was limited from 2006 to 2016 to include all SRs and/or meta-analyses (MAs) of pure in vitro studies. The evaluation of reporting quality was done using the PRISMA checklist.
Results: Out of 7702 search results, 65 SRs were included and evaluated with the PRISMA checklist. Overall, the mean overall quality score of reported items of the PRISMA checklist was 68%. We have noticed an increasing pattern in the numbers of published SRs of in vitro studies over the last 10 years. In contrast, the reporting quality was not …
学术搜索中的文章
A Elshafay, ES Omran, M Abdelkhalek, MO El-Badry… - Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2019