作者
David Hernandez Morales, Manuel Requena, Marta de Dios Lascuevas, Marta Olive-Gadea, Laura L Gramegna, Marian Muchada, Eila Rivera, Alvaro Garcia-Tornel, Federica Rizzo, Carlos Piñana, David Rodriguez-Luna, Jorge Pagola, Francesco Diana, Jesus M Juega, Noelia Rodriguez-Villatoro, Marta Rubiera, Carlos A Molina, Marc Ribo, alejandro tomasello
发表日期
2024/2
期刊
Stroke
卷号
55
期号
Suppl_1
页码范围
A81-A81
出版商
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
简介
Introduction: Femoral artery is the most used access for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in stroke patients with a large vessel occlusion. Routine radial access has been proposed as an alternative following cardiology guidelines although its safety and efficacy remain controversial.
Hypothesis: Radial access for MT is non-inferior to femoral access in terms of final recanalization.
Methods: The study was an investigator-initiated, single-center, evaluator-blinded randomized clinical trial. Stroke patients undergoing MT, with femoral artery patency and radial artery diameter ≥2.5mm were randomly assigned (1:1) to either radial (60 patients) or femoral access (60 patients). The primary binary outcome was successful recanalization (final eTICI score 2b-3) assigned by blinded evaluators. In the per protocol analysis, patients with allocated access failure were considered non-recanalized. We established a non-inferiority …