作者
Paulius Bucius, Jennifer Erley, Radu Tanacli, Victoria Zieschang, Sorin Giusca, Grigorious Korosoglou, Henning Steen, Christian Stehning, Burkert Pieske, Elisabeth Pieske‐Kraigher, Andreas Schuster, Tomas Lapinskas, Sebastian Kelle
发表日期
2020/4
期刊
ESC heart failure
卷号
7
期号
2
页码范围
523-532
简介
Aims
A multitude of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) techniques are used for myocardial strain assessment; however, studies comparing them are limited. We sought to compare global longitudinal (GLS), circumferential (GCS), segmental longitudinal (SLS), and segmental circumferential (SCS) strain values, as well as reproducibility between CMR feature tracking (FT), tagging (TAG), and fast‐strain‐encoded (fast‐SENC) CMR techniques.
Methods and results
Eighteen subjects (11 healthy volunteers and seven patients with heart failure) underwent two CMR scans (1.5T, Philips) with identical parameters. Global and segmental strain values were measured using FT (Medis), TAG (Medviso), and fast‐SENC (Myocardial Solutions). Friedman's test, linear regression, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and Bland–Altman analyses were used to assess differences and correlation in measured GLS and GCS between …
学术搜索中的文章
P Bucius, J Erley, R Tanacli, V Zieschang, S Giusca… - ESC heart failure, 2020