作者
Hajer Nakua, Colin Hawco, Natalie J Forde, Michael Joseph, Maud Grillet, Delaney Johnson, Grace R Jacobs, Sean Hill, Aristotle N Voineskos, Anne L Wheeler, Meng-Chuan Lai, Peter Szatmari, Stelios Georgiades, Rob Nicolson, Russell Schachar, Jennifer Crosbie, Evdokia Anagnostou, Jason P Lerch, Paul D Arnold, Stephanie H Ameis
发表日期
2023/7/1
期刊
Neuroimage
卷号
274
页码范围
120119
出版商
Academic Press
简介
Introduction
Poor quality T1-weighted brain scans systematically affect the calculation of brain measures. Removing the influence of such scans requires identifying and excluding scans with noise and artefacts through a quality control (QC) procedure. While QC is critical for brain imaging analyses, it is not yet clear whether different QC approaches lead to the exclusion of the same participants. Further, the removal of poor-quality scans may unintentionally introduce a sampling bias by excluding the subset of participants who are younger and/or feature greater clinical impairment. This study had two aims: (1) examine whether different QC approaches applied to T1-weighted scans would exclude the same participants, and (2) examine how exclusion of poor-quality scans impacts specific demographic, clinical and brain measure characteristics between excluded and included participants in three large pediatric …
引用总数