作者
Praveen V Mummaneni, Beejal Y Amin, Jau-Ching Wu, Erika D Brodt, Joseph R Dettori, Rick C Sasso
发表日期
2012/2
来源
Evidence-based spine-care journal
卷号
3
期号
S 01
页码范围
59-66
出版商
© AOSpine International
简介
Study design: Systematic review.
Clinical question: Does single-level unconstrained, semiconstrained, or fully constrained cervical artificial disc replacement (C-ADR) improve health outcomes compared with single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the long-term?
Methods: A systematic review was undertaken for articles published up to October 2011. Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched to identify US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) studies reporting long-term (≥ 48 months) follow-up results of C-ADR compared with ACDF. Non-FDA trials and FDA trials reporting outcomes at short-term or mid-term follow-up periods were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the strength of evidence using the GRADE criteria and disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Results: Two FDA trials reporting outcomes following C-ADR (Bryan disc, Prestige …
引用总数
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220231391169793156