作者
Nora B Henrikson, Paula R Blasi, Caitlin N Dorsey, Kayne D Mettert, Matthew B Nguyen, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Jennifer Macuiba, Laura M Gottlieb, Cara C Lewis
发表日期
2019/12/1
来源
American journal of preventive medicine
卷号
57
期号
6
页码范围
S13-S24
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Context
Health systems increasingly are exploring implementation of standardized social risk assessments. Implementation requires screening tools both with evidence of validity and reliability (psychometric properties) and that are low cost, easy to administer, readable, and brief (pragmatic properties). These properties for social risk assessment tools are not well understood and could help guide selection of assessment tools and future research.
Evidence acquisition
The systematic review was conducted during 2018 and included literature from PubMed and CINAHL published between 2000 and May 18, 2018. Included studies were based in the U.S., included tools that addressed at least 2 social risk factors (economic stability, education, social and community context, healthcare access, neighborhood and physical environment, or food), and were administered in a clinical setting. Manual literature searching was …
学术搜索中的文章
NB Henrikson, PR Blasi, CN Dorsey, KD Mettert… - American journal of preventive medicine, 2019