作者
CC Earle, RH Chapman, CS Baker, CM Bell, PW Stone, EA Sandberg, PJ Neumann
发表日期
2000/9/18
来源
Journal of Clinical Oncology
卷号
18
期号
18
页码范围
3302-3317
出版商
American Society of Clinical Oncology
简介
PURPOSE: Cost-utility analyses (CUAs) present the value of an intervention as the ratio of its incremental cost divided by its incremental survival benefit, with survival weighted by utilities to produce quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We critically reviewed the CUA literature and its role in informing clinical oncology practice, research priorities, and policy.
METHODS: The English-language literature was searched between 1975 and1997 for CUAs. Two readers abstracted from each article descriptions of the clinical situation and patients, the methods used, study perspective, the measures of effectiveness, costs included, discounting, and whether sensitivity analyses were performed. The readers then made subjective quality assessments. We also extracted utility values from the reviewed papers, along with information on how and from whom utilities were measured.
RESULTS: Our search yielded 40 studies …
引用总数
20012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202491423171830262019211612112018115101257433
学术搜索中的文章
CC Earle, RH Chapman, CS Baker, CM Bell, PW Stone… - Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2000