作者
Ingrid Eshun-Wilson, Muhammad S Jamil, T Charles Witzel, David V Glidded, Cheryl Johnson, Noelle Le Trouneau, Nathan Ford, Kathleen McGee, Chris Kemp, Stefan Baral, Sheree Schwartz, Elvin H Geng
发表日期
2021/8/15
来源
Clinical Infectious Diseases
卷号
73
期号
4
页码范围
e1018-e1028
出版商
Oxford University Press
简介
Background
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to identify which human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) self-testing (HIVST) distribution strategies are most effective.
Methods
We abstracted data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies published between 4 June 2006 and 4 June 2019.
Results
We included 33 studies, yielding 6 HIVST distribution strategies. All distribution strategies increased testing uptake compared to standard testing: in sub-Saharan Africa, partner HIVST distribution ranked highest (78% probability); in North America, Asia, and the Pacific regions, web-based distribution ranked highest (93% probability), and facility based distribution ranked second in all settings. Across HIVST distribution strategies HIV positivity and linkage was similar to standard testing.
Conclusions
A …
学术搜索中的文章
I Eshun-Wilson, MS Jamil, TC Witzel, DV Glidded… - Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2021