作者
Mark S Freedman, Edward J Thompson, Florian Deisenhammer, Gavin Giovannoni, Guy Grimsley, Geoffrey Keir, Sten Öhman, Michael K Racke, Mohammad Sharief, Christian JM Sindic, Finn Sellebjerg, Wallace W Tourtellotte
发表日期
2005/6/1
期刊
Archives of neurology
卷号
62
期号
6
页码范围
865-870
出版商
American Medical Association
简介
New criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) were published as the result of an internationally formed committee. To increase the specificity of diagnosis and to minimize the number of false diagnoses, the committee recommended the use of both clinical and paraclinical criteria, the latter involving information obtained from magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Although rigorous magnetic resonance imaging requirements were provided, the “new criteria paper” fell short in terms of guidelines as to how the CSF analysis should be performed and simply equated the IgG index with isoelectric focusing, without any justification. The spectrum of parameters analyzed and methods for CSF analysis differ worldwide and often yield variable results in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reliability, with no decided “optimal” CSF test for the diagnosis of MS …
引用总数
20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024716282425303558474343293642434646555423