查看文章

Subgroup analysis, as the key component of personalized medicine development, has attracted a lot of interest in recent years. While a number of exploratory subgroup searching approaches have been proposed, informative evaluation criteria and scenario-based systematic comparison of these methods are still underdeveloped topics. In this article, we propose two evaluation criteria in connection with traditional type I error and power concepts, and another criterion to directly assess recovery performance of the underlying treatment effect structure. Extensive simulation studies are carried out to investigate empirical performance of a variety of tree-based exploratory subgroup methods under the proposed criteria. A real data application is also included to illustrate the necessity and importance of method evaluation.