作者
Ruaraidh A Hill, Yenal Dündar, Ameet Bakhai, Rumona Dickson, Tom Walley
发表日期
2004/6/1
来源
European heart journal
卷号
25
期号
11
页码范围
902-919
出版商
Oxford University Press
简介
Aims To provide systematic assessment of the clinical effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus non-DES to inform national guidance.
Methods and results The review was conducted according to internationally recognised methods. The search strategy identified published (7) and unpublished (7) randomised controlled trials comparing the use of DES to non-DES. Outcomes included death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), revascularisation, event rate (composite of adverse events), and binary restenosis. Data synthesis included descriptive statistics and meta-analysis. Fourteen randomised clinical trials comparing DES to non-DES and involving 5747 patients were identified.
There were reductions in event rates between DES and non-DES; odds ratio (OR) 0.63 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.47, 0.84, \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage …
引用总数
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202492736212111811273253412321
学术搜索中的文章
RA Hill, Y Dündar, A Bakhai, R Dickson, T Walley - European heart journal, 2004