作者
Zoe Paskins, VD Torres Roldan, Ashley W Hawarden, Laurna Bullock, S Meritxell Urtecho, GF Torres, L Morera, NR Espinoza Suarez, A Worrall, S Blackburn, S Chapman, C Jinks, JP Brito
发表日期
2020/10
来源
Osteoporosis International
卷号
31
期号
10
页码范围
1837-1851
出版商
Springer London
简介
Decision aids (DAs) are evidence-based tools that support shared decision-making (SDM) implementation in practice; this study aimed to identify existing osteoporosis DAs and assess their quality and efficacy; and to gain feedback from a patient advisory group on findings and implications for further research. We searched multiple bibliographic databases to identify research studies from 2000 to 2019 and undertook an environmental scan (search conducted February 2019, repeated in March 2020). A pair of reviewers, working independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, evaluated each trial’s risk of bias, and conducted DA quality assessment using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Public contributors (patients and caregivers with experience of osteoporosis and fragility fractures) participated in discussion groups to review a sample of DAs, express preferences for a …
引用总数
2020202120222023202412329
学术搜索中的文章