作者
Metin Çağdaş, Süleyman Karakoyun, İbrahim Rencüzoğulları, Yavuz Karabağ, Mahmut Yesin, Yalçın Velibey, İnanç Artaç, Doğan İliş, Süleyman Çağan Efe, Onur Taşar, Halil İbrahim Tanboğa
发表日期
2018/1
期刊
Anatolian journal of cardiology
卷号
19
期号
1
页码范围
50
出版商
Turkish Society of Cardiology
简介
Objective: T-peak–T-end (TPE) interval, which represents the dispersion of repolarization, is defined as the interval between the peak and end of the T-wave, and is associated with increased malignant ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although prolonged TPE interval is associated with poor short-and long-term outcomes, even in patients with STEMI treated with successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), clinical, angiographic, and laboratory parameters that affect TPE remain to be elucidated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential relationship between prolonged TPE interval and reperfusion success using ST segment resolution (STR) in patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI. Methods: In the current study, 218 consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent pPCI were enrolled; after exclusion, 164 patients were included in the study population.
Results: Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of complete (STR%≥ 70) or incomplete (STR%< 70) STR. Preprocedural corrected TPE (cTPEPRE; 116±21 ms vs. 108±21 ms; p= 0.027), postprocedural TPE (TPEPOST; 107±16 ms vs. 92±21 ms; p< 0.001), and postprocedural cTPE (cTPEPOST; 119±19 ms vs. 102±17 ms; p< 0.001) intervals were significantly longer in patients with incomplete STR than in patients with complete STR, whereas there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pre-and postprocedural and corrected QT intervals. cTPEPRE and cTPEPOST were found to be independent predictors for incomplete STR …
引用总数
20182019202020212022202320242110222