作者
Jennifer R Stark, Sven Perner, Meir J Stampfer, Jennifer A Sinnott, Stephen Finn, Anna S Eisenstein, Jing Ma, Michelangelo Fiorentino, Tobias Kurth, Massimo Loda, Edward L Giovannucci, Mark A Rubin, Lorelei A Mucci
发表日期
2009/7/20
期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
卷号
27
期号
21
页码范围
3459-3464
出版商
American Society of Clinical Oncology
简介
Purpose
Gleason grading is an important predictor of prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes. Studies using surrogate PCa end points suggest outcomes for Gleason score (GS) 7 cancers vary according to the predominance of pattern 4. These studies have influenced clinical practice, but it is unclear if rates of PCa mortality differ for 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 tumors. Using PCa mortality as the primary end point, we compared outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 cancers, and the predictive ability of GS from a standardized review versus original scoring.
Patients and Methods
Three study pathologists conducted a blinded standardized review of 693 prostatectomy and 119 biopsy specimens to assign primary and secondary Gleason patterns. Tumor specimens were from PCa patients diagnosed between 1984 and 2004 from the Physicians' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. Lethal PCa (n = 53) was defined as …
引用总数
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024414292837244045343844312533158
学术搜索中的文章
JR Stark, S Perner, MJ Stampfer, JA Sinnott, S Finn… - Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009