作者
Michael G Kahn, Tiffany J Callahan, Juliana Barnard, Alan E Bauck, Jeff Brown, Bruce N Davidson, Hossein Estiri, Carsten Goerg, Erin Holve, Steven G Johnson, Siaw-Teng Liaw, Marianne Hamilton-Lopez, Daniella Meeker, Toan C Ong, Patrick Ryan, Ning Shang, Nicole G Weiskopf, Chunhua Weng, Meredith N Zozus, Lisa Schilling
发表日期
2016
期刊
Egems
卷号
4
期号
1
出版商
Ubiquity Press
简介
Objective:
Harmonized data quality (DQ) assessment terms, methods, and reporting practices can establish a common understanding of the strengths and limitations of electronic health record (EHR) data for operational analytics, quality improvement, and research. Existing published DQ terms were harmonized to a comprehensive unified terminology with definitions and examples and organized into a conceptual framework to support a common approach to defining whether EHR data is ‘fit’for specific uses.
Materials and Methods:
DQ publications, informatics and analytics experts, managers of established DQ programs, and operational manuals from several mature EHR-based research networks were reviewed to identify potential DQ terms and categories. Two face-to-face stakeholder meetings were used to vet an initial set of DQ terms and definitions that were grouped into an overall conceptual framework …
引用总数
201720182019202020212022202320241232484761707945