作者
Neha Batura, Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström, Priya Agrawal, Archana Bagra, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Fiammetta Bozzani, Tim Colbourn, Giulia Greco, Tanvir Hossain, Rajesh Sinha, Bidur Thapa, Jolene Skordis-Worrall
发表日期
2014/12/1
期刊
Global health action
卷号
7
期号
1
页码范围
23257
出版商
Taylor & Francis
简介
Background
Current guidelines for the conduct of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) are mainly applicable to facility-based interventions in high-income settings. Differences in the unit of analysis and the high cost of data collection can make these guidelines challenging to follow within public health trials in low- and middle- income settings.
Objective
This paper reflects on the challenges experienced within our own work and proposes solutions that may be useful to others attempting to collect, analyse, and compare cost data between public health research sites in low- and middle-income countries.
Design
We describe the generally accepted methods (norms) for collecting and analysing cost data in a single-site trial from the provider perspective. We then describe our own experience applying these methods within eight comparable cluster randomised, controlled, trials. We describe the strategies used to maximise …
引用总数
201520162017201820192020202120222023202445627714762
学术搜索中的文章