作者
Alejandro Lemor, Seyed Hamed Hosseini Dehkordi, Mir B Basir, Pedro A Villablanca, Tarun Jain, Gerald C Koenig, Khaldoon Alaswad, Jeffrey W Moses, Navin K Kapur, William O'Neill
发表日期
2020/12/1
期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
卷号
21
期号
12
页码范围
1465-1471
出版商
Elsevier
简介
Background
Percutaneous ventricular assist devices and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are increasingly used for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in hospitals throughout the United States.
Methods
Using the National Inpatient Sample from October 2015 to December 2017, we identified hospital admissions that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and non-elective Impella or ECMO placement for AMI-CS using ICD-10 codes. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare both groups for primary and secondary outcomes.
Results
We identified 6290 admissions for AMI-CS who underwent PCI and were treated with Impella (n = 5730, 91%) or ECMO (n = 560, 9%) from October 2015 to December 2017. After propensity-match analysis, the ECMO cohort had significantly higher in-hospital mortality …
学术搜索中的文章
Impella versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock
A Lemor, SHH Dehkordi, MB Basir, PA Villablanca… - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 2020
