作者
Cecilia Olsson, Anders Ringnér, Gunilla Borglin
发表日期
2014/3/1
来源
Nurse education in practice
卷号
14
期号
2
页码范围
102-105
出版商
Churchill Livingstone
简介
Nowadays, gathering and synthesising evidence, i.e. conducting systematic reviews, is considered an important part of any health service research endeavour. Reviewing the literature, however suggest that it is not yet common that PhD students/doctoral candidates publish systematic reviews or even include a high quality review of the literature as a part of their PhD programme or candidature. Implying that systematic reviewing skills might not be acquired by going through an education on a postgraduate level. Additionally, scholars debating systematic reviews ‘to be or not to be’ as a part of research training seem to be sparse, especially within the field of nursing. In this issue for debate, we would like to propose that the absence of systematic reviews' in this context might severely hamper the ‘up and coming’ researchers as well as the research conducted. We envisage that this lack can have a negative impact on …
引用总数
20152016201720182019202020212022202320241122343541