作者
E Clarke Haley Jr, John LP Thompson, James C Grotta, Patrick D Lyden, Thomas G Hemmen, Devin L Brown, Christopher Fanale, Richard Libman, Thomas G Kwiatkowski, Rafael H Llinas, Steven R Levine, Karen C Johnston, Richard Buchsbaum, Gilberto Levy, Bruce Levin
发表日期
2010/4/1
期刊
Stroke
卷号
41
期号
4
页码范围
707-711
出版商
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
简介
Background and Purpose— Intravenous alteplase (rtPA) remains the only approved treatment for acute ischemic stroke, but its use remains limited. In a previous pilot dose-escalation study, intravenous tenecteplase showed promise as a potentially safer alternative. Therefore, a Phase IIB clinical trial was begun to (1) choose a best dose of tenecteplase to carry forward; and (2) to provide evidence for either promise or futility of further testing of tenecteplase versus rtPA. If promise was established, then the trial would continue as a Phase III efficacy trial comparing the selected tenecteplase dose to standard rtPA.
Methods— The trial began as a small, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing 0.1, 0.25, and 0.4 mg/kg tenecteplase with standard 0.9 mg/kg rtPA in patients with acute stroke within 3 hours of onset. An adaptive sequential design used an early (24-hour) assessment of …
引用总数
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202442118191920161420191619273827